Hill presents Edmund Hooper as a violent imposing figure, who shows no sympathy Essay

mound presents the character Edmund Hooper as a unsympathetic character. Hills uses the technique of bodacious language to present Edmund as unsympathetic character You were only tenants then, Edmund get aheads no effort to make his sentence whatever politer. The word only is chosen by Hill to try and degrade Kingshaws status and to picture him, inferior to Edmund. Hill continues to show that Edmund is an unsympathetic character When did he die?. The terminal of Kingshaws father is a personnel matter, and the usual person is likely to feel sympathetic towards Kingshaw. Hill purposefully gives the question asked by Edmund no expression, the ratifier has no idea how Edmund states the question. By non including any expression, the reader is given the impression that Edmund is ignorant to the death of Kingshaws father, he is instead focused on being an imposing figure.Edmund is portrayed as an imposing figure and his unsympathetic nature reinforces this view. Furthermore Edmunds actions portray him as a imposing figure Hooper looked at him coldly, the word coldly would suggests lack of perception and warmth. Edmunds lack of emotion frightens the readers. The reader develops an chassis of an emotionless child, Edmund shows no emotion towards his father both Hooper stood very still, turning the pencil round and round, the word still can be cerebrate to the lack of motion, Edmund is in one sense frozen, he emits no emotions, no warmth towards no one. Turning the pencil round and round could suggest that Edmund is like an endless loop, he is shown to have no personality and trying to make contact with Edmund is like going round and round, you do not end up anywhere different, you keep on going round in a circle.Finally, Edmund is shown to be violent He brocaded his fists and came at Kingshaw. Fists are can be associated with boxing- a violent sport. Edmund with his fists raised give the reader and image of a boy ready to fight. The word came suggests Edmun d can be compared to an prey more than a human, which suggests that Edmund is a very unusual human, he is more like an object, emotionless and violent.The violence is emphasised as Edmund has only just met Kingshaw, the mere fact Edmund attacks Kingshaw almost immediately after group meeting Kingshaw suggests Edmund does not try to understand Kingshaw, he just attacks Kingshaw to be seen as the superior person. Edmund shows no regret in hurting Kingshaw, Ill bash you again. The word bash is not associated with humans provided objects. It is unusual to say Ill bash you. Bash is a very violent word and the reader sees Edmund as intimidating and violent. The word again suggests that Edmund will willingly hurt someone, repeatedly. The repetetion of Edmunds violent nature tells gives the image of an imposing character.Hill tries to present Edmund as an imposing figure so that Edmunds character contrasts with Kingshaw. The reader sees Kingshaw as the victim and Edmund as the bully. Th e dispute between Kingshaw and Edmund is what engages the reader, and as the two characters have opposing personalities, conflict occurs a lot more frequently. The reader continues to read in anticipation that more conflict will occur, the conflict excites the reader and produces suspense.